Coldcard MK4 vs Ledger Nano X


Key differences
- Coldcard MK4 is Bitcoin-only and built for extreme security with dual secure elements and air-gapped operation; Ledger Nano X supports 5,500+ coins with Bluetooth convenience.
- Ledger Nano X is slightly more affordable at $149 vs Coldcard's $167.94, and easier for beginners due to its companion app Ledger Live.
- Coldcard offers physical keypad entry and microSD air-gap transfers, while Ledger relies on computer or Bluetooth-based input—making Coldcard better for users prioritizing offline isolation.
Jump to section
Price

$167.94 USD

$149 USD
Launch

2022

2019
Screen Size

128x64 pixel OLED display

1.09" Monochrome OLED display
Box Includes

- COLDCARD™ Mk4

- Nano X hardware wallet
- USB-C to USB-A cable
- getting started leaflet
- 3 recovery sheets
- keychain strap
Security Features
Passphrase Support


Passphrase Entry

Device

Computer
PIN Protection


Shamir Secret Sharing


Tor Support


Usage
Platforms

- Windows
- macOS
- Linux
- Android
- iOS

- Windows
- macOS
- Linux
- Android
- iOS
Supported Coins

Bitcoin Only

Secure and manage over 5,500 different coins and tokens including Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, USD Tether, Polkadot, Litecoin, and more.
Interfaces

Numeric Keypad, NFC-V, USB-C, AirGap SneakerNET, Virtual Disk, MicroSD Card

USB-C, Bluetooth
Technical Details
Secure Elements

- Dual Secure Elements (ATECC608 & DS28C36B)
- AES-256-CTR encrypted storage
- COLDCARD Co-Signing (CCC)

CC EAL5+ certified secure chip
Open Source

Firmware & Software

Software
FIDO Authentication


Size

86x50x7.5 mm (3.39x1.97x0.3 in)

72x18.6x11.75 mm (2.83x0.73x0.46 in)
Weight

30g (1.1oz)

34g (1.2oz)
Bitcoin-Only Version


Integration & Multisig
Integrations
Company Details
Parent Company

Coinkite

Ledger
Parent Company Founded

2011

2014
Security Incidents

No known security incidents

A crypto user claims they lost $2.5 million in Bitcoin and NFTs from a Ledger Nano S, sparking scrutiny over Ledger's security. While the user insists the seed phrase was secure, the incident has reignited debate over hardware wallet vulnerabilities and possible user error.