BitBox02 vs Ledger Nano X


Key differences
- BitBox02 uses dual-chip security with full open-source hardware and software, while Ledger Nano X relies on a single secure chip and closed-source hardware.
- Ledger Nano X is cheaper at $149 vs BitBox02's $172, and includes Bluetooth for mobile use.
- BitBox02 supports only Bitcoin and Ethereum-based tokens, while Ledger Nano X supports 5,500+ coins and has built-in buy/sell features through Ledger Live.
Jump to section
Price

$172 USD

$149 USD
Launch

2019

2019
Screen Size

128 x 64px white OLED display

1.09" Monochrome OLED display
Box Includes

BitBox02 hardware wallet, microSD card, USB-C to USB-A adapter, USB-C extension cable, Rubber pulls, Labelling stickers

- Nano X hardware wallet
- USB-C to USB-A cable
- getting started leaflet
- 3 recovery sheets
- keychain strap
Security Features
Passphrase Support


Passphrase Entry

Computer

Computer
PIN Protection


Shamir Secret Sharing


Tor Support


Usage
Platforms

- macOS
- Windows
- Linux
- Android

- Windows
- macOS
- Linux
- Android
- iOS
Supported Coins

Bitcoin & 1500+ ERC20 coins and tokens

Secure and manage over 5,500 different coins and tokens including Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, USD Tether, Polkadot, Litecoin, and more.
Interfaces

USB-C

USB-C, Bluetooth
Technical Details
Secure Elements

Dual Chip Security (ATECC608B & ATSAMD51J20A)

CC EAL5+ certified secure chip
Open Source

Hardware & Software

Software
FIDO Authentication


Size

54.5x25.4x9.6 mm (2.14x0.99x0.37 in) including USB-C plug

72x18.6x11.75 mm (2.83x0.73x0.46 in)
Weight

12gg (0.4oz)

34g (1.2oz)
Bitcoin-Only Version


Integration & Multisig
Integrations

- Electrum
- Specter
- Sparrow
Multisig Support

- Electrum
Company Details
Parent Company

BitBox

Ledger
Parent Company Founded

2015

2014
Security Incidents

No known security incidents

A crypto user claims they lost $2.5 million in Bitcoin and NFTs from a Ledger Nano S, sparking scrutiny over Ledger's security. While the user insists the seed phrase was secure, the incident has reignited debate over hardware wallet vulnerabilities and possible user error.